And got this reply:GO (A Chinese and Japanese board game) is a lousy game. It is boring and exhausting. All pieces (stones) are identical, showing oriental culture does not tolerate individuality. The result is either win or lose and there is no draw, indicating oriental culture does not advocate compromise. No physical representation is assigned to any piece, implying oriental people have no personality. Yeh, there is a Chinese chess. But that was brought from India and Chinese made some changes into it. A pawn can not be promoted and Queen is missing from action. Chinese do not respect small-time nobody and discriminate against women. They count cannon in as a chessman because they love more violence. They replace bishop with prime minister because they believe in power than free thinking. Finally they create two guards for their general or marshall since they are more scared and they are real "paper tigers". (There is no King in Chinese chess, the purpose of the game is to catch the general or the marshall)
Chess, an Occidental bored game is a lousy game. It's too simple and doesn't need to much brain. Different pieces are given different power and ability, showing the Anglo passion for class. Unlike the Go, as the game progresses, pieces are killed and less pieces are left than the opening of the game, implying the Occidental culture's preference for destruction. Whereas in Go, more pieces exist than the opening, and all pieces eventually coexist in an integrated way, showing that Oriental culture prefers peace and harmony. Besides, the black square bishop can not move into white squares indicating the Occidentals have always been promoting aparthied. However, there is something good about Chess, the king has to depend on his wife for strength, a justification for the Americans' choice of Bill Clinton as their president.